CVE Database

The llhttp parser in the http module in Node v20.2.0 does not strictly use the CRLF sequence to delimit HTTP requests. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS). The CR character (without LF) is sufficient to delimit HTTP header fields in the llhttp parser. According to RFC7230 section 3, only the CRLF sequence should delimit each header-field. This impacts all Node.js active versions: v16, v18, and, v20

A null pointer dereference issue was found in Libtiff's tif_dir.c file. This issue may allow an attacker to pass a crafted TIFF image file to the tiffcp utility which triggers a runtime error that causes undefined behavior. This will result in an application crash, eventually leading to a denial of service.

libtiff 4.5.0 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in uv_encode() when libtiff reads a corrupted little-endian TIFF file and specifies the output to be big-endian.

libtiff 4.5.0 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow via /libtiff/tools/tiffcrop.c:8499. Incorrect updating of buffer size after rotateImage() in tiffcrop cause heap-buffer-overflow and SEGV.

A ReDoS issue was discovered in the URI component before 0.12.2 for Ruby. The URI parser mishandles invalid URLs that have specific characters. There is an increase in execution time for parsing strings to URI objects with rfc2396_parser.rb and rfc3986_parser.rb. NOTE: this issue exists becuse of an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-28755. Version 0.10.3 is also a fixed version.

The WordPress Social Login and Register (Discord, Google, Twitter, LinkedIn) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in versions up to, and including, 7.6.4. This is due to insufficient encryption on the user being supplied during a login validated through the plugin. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any existing user on the site, such as an administrator, if they know the email address associated with that user. This was partially patched in version 7.6.4 and fully patched in version 7.6.5.

In applyRemoteView of NotificationContentInflater.java, there is a possible way to hide foreground service notification due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-251586912

Unchecked parameter value in M-Files Server in versions before 23.6.12695.3 (excluding 23.2 SR2 and newer) allows anonymous user to cause denial of service

Affected versions Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) are vulnerable to potential authenticated reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks due to user input validation and sanitization issues. Please note: an attacker must first obtain authentication to Apex Central on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32604.

Affected versions Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) are vulnerable to potential authenticated reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks due to user input validation and sanitization issues. Please note: an attacker must first obtain authentication to Apex Central on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32605.

Affected versions Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) are vulnerable to potential authenticated reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks due to user input validation and sanitization issues. Please note: an attacker must first obtain authentication to Apex Central on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32536.

Affected versions Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) are vulnerable to potential authenticated reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks due to user input validation and sanitization issues. Please note: an attacker must first obtain authentication to Apex Central on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32537.

Certain dashboard widgets on Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks that may allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution on affected servers. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32531 through 32534.

Certain dashboard widgets on Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks that may allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution on affected servers. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32531 through 32535.

Certain dashboard widgets on Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks that may allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution on affected servers. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32531 through 32535.

Certain dashboard widgets on Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks that may allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution on affected servers. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32531 through 32535.

Certain dashboard widgets on Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks that may allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution on affected servers. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32532 through 32535.

Vulnerable modules of Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) contain vulnerabilities which would allow authenticated users to perform a SQL injection that could lead to remote code execution. Please note: an attacker must first obtain authentication on the target system in order to exploit these vulnerabilities. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32529.

Vulnerable modules of Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) contain vulnerabilities which would allow authenticated users to perform a SQL injection that could lead to remote code execution. Please note: an attacker must first obtain authentication on the target system in order to exploit these vulnerabilities. This is similar to, but not identical to CVE-2023-32530.

The MStore API plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Unauthenticated Blind SQL Injection via the 'id' parameter in versions up to, and including, 4.0.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameters and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.

A type confusion issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 16.5.1 and iPadOS 16.5.1, iOS 15.7.7 and iPadOS 15.7.7, macOS Ventura 13.4.1, Safari 16.5.1. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited.

A memory corruption issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.3, Safari 16.4, iOS 16.4 and iPadOS 16.4, iOS 15.7.7 and iPadOS 15.7.7. Processing web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited against versions of iOS released before iOS 15.7.

An integer overflow was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in watchOS 9.5.2, macOS Big Sur 11.7.8, iOS 15.7.7 and iPadOS 15.7.7, macOS Monterey 12.6.7, watchOS 8.8.1, iOS 16.5.1 and iPadOS 16.5.1, macOS Ventura 13.4.1. An app may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited against versions of iOS released before iOS 15.7.

The issue was addressed with improved bounds checks. This issue is fixed in watchOS 9.5, tvOS 16.5, macOS Ventura 13.4, iOS 15.7.8 and iPadOS 15.7.8, Safari 16.5, iOS 16.5 and iPadOS 16.5. A remote attacker may be able to break out of Web Content sandbox. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited.

A logic issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Big Sur 11.7.7, macOS Monterey 12.6.6, macOS Ventura 13.4. An app may be able to modify protected parts of the file system.

A use-after-free issue was addressed with improved memory management. This issue is fixed in macOS Big Sur 11.7.7, macOS Monterey 12.6.6, macOS Ventura 13.4. A remote attacker may be able to cause unexpected app termination or arbitrary code execution.

A use-after-free issue was addressed with improved memory management. This issue is fixed in watchOS 9.5, tvOS 16.5, macOS Ventura 13.4, iOS 15.7.6 and iPadOS 15.7.6, Safari 16.5, iOS 16.5 and iPadOS 16.5. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited.

An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in watchOS 9.5, tvOS 16.5, macOS Ventura 13.4, iOS 15.7.6 and iPadOS 15.7.6, Safari 16.5, iOS 16.5 and iPadOS 16.5. Processing web content may disclose sensitive information. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited.

An Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). When a BGP update message is received over an established BGP session, and that message contains a specific, optional transitive attribute, this session will be torn down with an update message error. This issue cannot propagate beyond an affected system as the processing error occurs as soon as the update is received. This issue is exploitable remotely as the respective attribute can propagate through unaffected systems and intermediate AS (if any). Continuous receipt of a BGP update containing this attribute will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Some customers have experienced these BGP session flaps which prompted Juniper SIRT to release this advisory out of cycle before fixed releases are widely available as there is an effective workaround. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 15.1R1 and later versions prior to 20.4R3-S8; 21.1 version 21.1R1 and later versions prior to 21.2R3-S6; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S5; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S4; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S4; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3-S2; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3-S1; 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R2-S1, 22.4R3; 23.1 versions prior to 23.1R1-S1, 23.1R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved All versions prior to 20.4R3-S8-EVO; 21.1 version 21.1R1-EVO and later versions prior to 21.2R3-S6-EVO; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S5-EVO; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S4-EVO; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S4-EVO; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3-S2-EVO; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2-S2-EVO, 22.3R3-S1-EVO; 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R2-S1-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO; 23.1 versions prior to 23.1R1-S1-EVO, 23.1R2-EVO.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in PaperCut NG/MF, which, under specific conditions, could potentially enable an attacker to alter security settings or execute arbitrary code. This could be exploited if the target is an admin with a current login session. Exploiting this would typically involve the possibility of deceiving an admin into clicking a specially crafted malicious link, potentially leading to unauthorized changes.

A NULL pointer dereference in TIFFClose() is caused by a failure to open an output file (non-existent path or a path that requires permissions like /dev/null) while specifying zones.

The pre-authentication command injection vulnerability in the Zyxel NAS326 firmware versions prior to V5.21(AAZF.14)C0, NAS540 firmware versions prior to V5.21(AATB.11)C0, and NAS542 firmware versions prior to V5.21(ABAG.11)C0 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute some operating system (OS) commands remotely by sending a crafted HTTP request.

In Suricata before 6.0.13 (when there is an adversary who controls an external source of rules), a dataset filename, that comes from a rule, may trigger absolute or relative directory traversal, and lead to write access to a local filesystem. This is addressed in 6.0.13 by requiring allow-absolute-filenames and allow-write (in the datasets rules configuration section) if an installation requires traversal/writing in this situation.

SolarWinds Serv-U is submitting an HTTP request when changing or updating the attributes for File Share or File request.  Part of the URL of the request discloses sensitive data.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Layout module's SEO configuration in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.70 through 7.4.3.73, and Liferay DXP 7.4 update 70 through 73 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the `_com_liferay_layout_admin_web_portlet_GroupPagesPortlet_backURL` parameter.

loadImage() in tools/tiffcrop.c in LibTIFF through 4.5.0 has a heap-based use after free via a crafted TIFF image.

Use of Java's default temporary directory for file creation in `FileBackedOutputStream` in Google Guava versions 1.0 to 31.1 on Unix systems and Android Ice Cream Sandwich allows other users and apps on the machine with access to the default Java temporary directory to be able to access the files created by the class. Even though the security vulnerability is fixed in version 32.0.0, we recommend using version 32.0.1 as version 32.0.0 breaks some functionality under Windows.

The MStore API plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation on the mstore_update_limit_product function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update limit the number of product per category to use cache data in home screen via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft Streaming Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

A fully compromised ESXi host can force VMware Tools to fail to authenticate host-to-guest operations, impacting the confidentiality and integrity of the guest virtual machine.

A vulnerability has been identified in CP-8031 MASTER MODULE (All versions < CPCI85 V05), CP-8050 MASTER MODULE (All versions < CPCI85 V05). The web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges.

A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices are missing cookie protection flags when using the default settings. An attacker who gains access to a session token can use it to impersonate a legitimate application user.

A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). The web interface of the affected devices are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. By tricking an authenticated victim user to click a malicious link, an attacker could perform arbitrary actions on the device on behalf of the victim user.

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.11 and below, version 6.4.12 and below, version 6.0.16 and below and FortiProxy version 7.2.3 and below, version 7.0.9 and below, version 2.0.12 and below, version 1.2 all versions, version 1.1 all versions SSL-VPN may allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specifically crafted requests.

Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilties [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet allows a local authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary shell code as `root` user via crafted CLI requests.

Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Kevon Adonis WP Abstracts plugin <= 2.6.2 versions.

MongoDB Ops Manager Diagnostics Archive may not redact sensitive PEM key file password app settings. Archives do not include the PEM files themselves. This issue affects MongoDB Ops Manager v5.0 prior to 5.0.21 and MongoDB Ops Manager v6.0 prior to 6.0.12